Jump to content

Super33

Members
  • Posts

    509
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Super33

  1. Sometimes just leaning forward a few more inches will prevent limp shouldering and allow that cheap crap to cycle. I've run tests between myself and other people and myself and myself with different stances and there was a difference.

     

    I cannot say that my M4 will reliably cycle weaker ammo but I can say I can reliably shoot my M4 with weaker ammo. I usually have to give some pointers to friends (experienced shooters as well) on their stance when the M4 fails to cycle. They'll have the gun shouldered correctly but they'll just not be leaning their body weight towards the front.

     

    That's my 2 cents.

     

    That being said, it never fails the OO buck or slugs. Ever.

  2. I disagree... I wear sunglasses when shooting skeet all the time.. when it's sunny. Oakley Pro M frames, polarized.

    Sometimes I shoot low skeet, where they're flying about head distance from the ground, it's a good time.

    I know what's wrong with the photo, Obamma looks like an American, and he clearly is NOT.

  3. If it doesn't say "MADE IN USA" on it than I don't see the benefit of it other than to safe a few bucks. The factory stock is extremely well made and IMO a few other legit 922r parts to keep the M4 as high quality as possible is the better way to go.

     

    If you can't prove that it was made in the USA while you're at the range than it is not 922r compliant enough for me.

  4. Given the M4 is THE military shotgun..........I don't see it having a snowballs chance in h e l l of staying off of any ban list. That said, I don't see it happening to begin with so I'm optimistic.

     

    What he said. There is no way the king of semi auto shotguns will be excluded from any ban. Also, an assault weapons ban will not happen unless it's on a state level.

     

    That's just my opinion of course.

  5. WHY cant you write? Can't you read your post to see if it makes sense to anybody other than you before you post? Sir, you need to repeat grades 3-6 and learn how to write.

     

    HAHA! That's funny. I hope he wasn't driving when he struggled to post that! I've made a real ass of myself more than once by texting/posting from my phone. That damn auto-correct!

  6. Like the others here who live in CA, I'm probably much more familiar with limitations on second amendment rights than the majority of forum members.

     

    I know it's probably not a popular opinion on a gun forum, but I'm all for adding hurdles and restrictions on ownership if it meant that a sane, rational, well-intentioned person would have their full 2nd amendment rights as recognized by most of the non-restrictive states. I'd gladly take a routine psych exam, in-person safety training and tests, deeper background check, etc., if it meant that I could have an AR without a bullet button, no 10-round mag limits, and the right to carry. It'd even be nice if I could add a collapsible stock on my Benelli, or--god forbid--even buy one with

     

    Last night I read a post from someone on CNN who thought the age of ownership should be raised to late 20s, because most psychotic and schizophrenic conditions manifest by then. Of course, by media accounts the CT shooter took his dead mother's guns and used them at the school, so even if she passed such tests, this still would have happened. Again, putting restrictions on people who follow the law does not deter the criminals. Maybe people's ownership rights should be affected if those in their households are diagnosed with mental conditions? I see a million flaws with that, too.

     

    Ultimately I've never heard an argument from the NRA zealots or anti-gun zealots that would address the situation adequately. Confiscation wouldn't work, neither would unbridled availability. I would hope we all recognize the situation now is flawed.

     

    Unfortunately, the status quo sucks for those families in CT. I can't even imagine.

     

    This is sad to see. A living example of the government's intentions. One step at a time so people would gladly lighten their load by emptying their pockets of their rights a little here and a little there to make the march a little easier. Until they have nothing left.

  7. Of course you're being sarcastic, right?

     

    I'm being hopeful. I've been defending the 2nd amendment since yesterday afternoon and I feel like my head is about to pop. This is different, you're right. I honestly think this is the beginning of something big. But an all out gun grab won't happen, that would lead to civil war. Forums across the internet are blazing with gun control FIGHTS. People are feeling very strongly about this, I know I am. These senseless acts of violence are why they're after our right to bear arms but that's also the reason why we need that right more then ever.

     

    I hope that when peoples' emotions calm down they can see that attacking the 2nd amendment is exactly the opposite of what should be done. I guess we just have to do our part and spread the word and wait out the storm. Hopefully no real damage is done.

  8. DI and Piston both have their obvious advantages. There's an endless debate because people have different priorities. I ended up getting a piston because I don't know the future and I wanted the reliability, my AR is one of my SHTF guns. It's never jammed. A DI gun is reliable but the fact is it isn't as reliable as a piston under certain circumstances (poor maintenance, extensive shooting). I'm still amazed when I strip my AR down and the bolt is already clean after one wipe! I wish things went that smoothly in the bathroom!

  9. "Doing away with the forums"? Because of spammers? LOL!! How is that in Benelli's best interest? It was the forum that helped me and many others decide on what benelli gun to buy. Not to mention to buy a Benelli in the first place!

×
×
  • Create New...