MrMilitaryPolice Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 2 hours ago, Nocturnalnature said: I understood that reference ?! he understood it too...its why i have messages in my inbox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpha 33 Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 11 hours ago, MrMilitaryPolice said: he understood it too...its why i have messages in my inbox I've noticed several replies to this "benign" thread have been deleted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMilitaryPolice Posted April 19, 2021 Share Posted April 19, 2021 7 hours ago, alpha 33 said: I've noticed several replies to this "benign" thread have been deleted. yeah, ive noticed that as well. i guess he cant take the heat and hopes we have a short memory. i'd be ashamed too if i were him. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florian Posted April 20, 2021 Share Posted April 20, 2021 I just looked at mine closely, theres at least a 32nd clearance if not more between the receiver and base of the handle. Im betting the handle was pushed in a bit too far F Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bychance12 Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milspec Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 (edited) I’ve been meaning to post my not so scientific bolt handle comparisons for a while. I’ve been slacking but this seems like the perfect thread. In the photo below we have FFT NP3 steel charging handle, Benelli M4 OEM, KZ NP3 steel charging handle and a new revision TTI charging handle. By measuring with calipers I gathered some rough data. I measured from receiver facing side of the handle to the end of the shaft where it engages the detent inside of the carrier. Take these figure with a grain of salt but I believe they are a pretty close representation. Again this is from the receiver end of the handle (the part where the shaft begins) to the end of the shaft. In inches. FFT: 1.172 BM4 OEM: 1.184 KZ: 1.19 TTI: 1.21 My motivation for doing this was due to the fact that I perceived the FFT handle to sit quite close to the receiver. I noticed that if I inserted it with a little too much force it comes in contact with the receiver. This is not a knock against FFT or their handle. It’s just my personal experience and one could even say possible operator error on my part. In any event I wasn’t comfortable with the close proximity of the handle to the receiver. Todd sells oodles of these. Just some food for thought. As you can see from these examples in this particular “experiment” I found the TTI handle to have the most clearance or buffer if you will. Edited August 7, 2021 by Milspec 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bychance12 Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 The damage can be clearly seen on the finish of these M4’s in the pics and video. The 3/4 FFT H20 handle I purchased will not be used on my H20. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quest450 Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 (edited) The 1/2” is slightly better.....adds character Lol, but it could be an ejection mark Edited August 7, 2021 by quest450 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D'zaster Posted August 8, 2021 Share Posted August 8, 2021 I tried the GGG handle and got a bit of a mark. Went back to the KZ. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullassault Posted August 8, 2021 Share Posted August 8, 2021 Have the KZ , seems to have plenty of clearance. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milspec Posted August 8, 2021 Share Posted August 8, 2021 18 hours ago, quest450 said: The 1/2” is slightly better.....adds character Lol, but it could be an ejection mark Not to derail but I really like the checkering on the FFT bolt release. I just wish he had made the screw hole off set like the GG&G release. See how the FFT version slightly overlaps the bevel on the receiver. I like how the GG&G version allows for some space there if you choose. Just my opinion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.