Jump to content

uscm

Members
  • Posts

    33
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by uscm

  1. I was super nervous the first time I did it. Mostly because it was an unknown. Had I known what I know now ... I was genuinely shocked how easy it was. It was probably one of the easiest accessories I installed on my gun. Took just a few minutes to heat up, remove, clean the threads, install new tube. That's why I'm always shocked whenever people say they've bought a tube extension instead of a full tube. The cost of a decent tube extension is only a little cheaper than buying a full tube. And buying a full tube counts as 922® compliance whereas the extension does not.

  2. I bought one of Kip's (carrierComp) titanium tubes. It came with very clear and exact directions which were easy to follow. In a nut shell: strip the gun down. Cut a length (4-6 inches) of bicycle inner tubing (it's cheap and works awesomely as a gripping aid). Slide the inner tubing onto the old mag tube. Apply heat with a heat gun to the front of the receiver where the mag tube is inserted into. Apply even heat to all sides ... keep the heat gun moving. After a while, the factory locktite will turn back to liquid and the mag tube can be unscrewed. You don't want to overheat it, but you also don't want to under heat it before you start unscrewing it. Just keeping trying to unscrew it occasionally. It shouldn't take much force. I was able to unscrew the mag tube on my own without any additional help from another person, but the bike inner tubing really helped getting a grip on the old tube. Once you've removed the tube, clean up the receiver threads, apply new locktite to the new tube, screw back in. Easy.

  3. Interesting. I bought a GearSector mount specifically for this same purpose but when I realized it was designed to hold the light at an angle that the M80 couldn't accommodate, the mount ended up getting shelved. I'm still not comfortable about trimming back the M80's rubber since it was so much more expensive than the gearsector, but what I might try is shaving down the rear side of the gear sector mount gradually until it allows for some clearance between it and the M80. I'll let ya'll know how it goes. :)

  4. I had asked the folks at Mesa Tactical about the grip. I've highlighted the part that is especially worth noting:

     

    we basically reverse engineered the Benelli stock (without assistance from Benelli), so we tried to get as close as we could. When we first made prototypes of the grip, there was another problem with the prototype that overshadowed the boxy back portion of the grip, so we focused on fixing that. And as you know, we were always behind schedule.

     

    When the production grips appeared we noticed the boxiness. We aren't happy with it. A couple of things I'll say about that:

     

    1. If you really don't like the grip, you can remove it and install the Benelli factory grip. It should fit fine. If you want to glue it in place, we recommend a marine adhesive called Amazing Goop Marine Contact Adhesive and Sealant.

     

    2. We do plan to re-work the grip sleeve as much as we can without having to make a new mold. When this will happen we cannot say, but we intend to do it. When the new grip sleeves are available, we will send one to anyone who asks.

     

    That being said, as you observed, the stock is still comfortable to shoot with the boxy grip, certainly more comfortable than, say, the hard plastic grip of a Speedfeed IV (which otherwise is a fine stock). We have had only one real complaint from the field, plus your observation. It's just not as comfortable as the factory grip, and that is the gold standard we are trying to achieve.

    I believe they recommend this particular glue to reattach the original grip.

     

     

    -

  5. you poor thing, be glad you got one that allows you to go to shot, are we supposed to feel sorry for you :rolleyes:

    Ha, no. Well, a couple days of walking the floor is kinda fun the first couple years you go. But when you have to spend the entire week in meetings and interfacing with people it gets old pretty fast. Work wise it helps a lot because everyone in the industry is collected together in the same place and you get to deal directly with vendors and manufacturers and build relations that would otherwise be hard to do strictly via emails and phone calls. Enjoyment wise ... it's not particularly thrilling because you end up working and not seeing a whole lot. I get in Sunday and it's pretty much non-stop till the following Saturday.

  6. Just realized that although I'm going, I forgot to buy my plane tickets. Gotta deal with that tonight. I miss the old days when I wasn't going there for work.

  7. So, based on the various lists I've seen, a combination of 3 of the following commonly available US made parts are what people should be looking for in order to be 922r compliant:

    • Buttstock (with integral pistol grip)

    • Forearms / handguards

    •*Full length magazine tubes

    • Magazine tube follower

  8. It's crazy how well AlumaBlack works. I had a small scratch on my receiver when I was trying to get the bolt catch lever pin in and out just to install the GG&G bolt release pad. Initially tried to fix it with superBlack but you could easily spot it on the super smooth receiver. Finally found my bottle of AlumaBlack (covered in dust!), and a few quick minutes later the scratch was gone!

  9. The LOP of the factory stock is PERFECT for those of us that are 6' 4" :D

     

    Relatively speaking ... the shorter stocks are better for me. ;)

    They're also good for shooters that wear plates.

     

    Will the GG&G scratch the finish on the receiver?

    It's marking mine. Hard to tell if it's actually scratching it or if whatever is there will just wipe off from the M4 anodizing like most stuff does.

  10. Agreed. There are two things that the OEM M4 could definitely improve upon right out of the box (922r compliance aside) ... One is a shorter stock, and the other is a larger bolt release pad. Though extremely expensive, the GG&G version is absolutely worth it. Considering this was designed as a combat shotgun, a larger release like the GG&G should have been OEM from the start.

  11. Yeah.....well.....I thought I would try and be of some help. To bad these Urbino fanboys can't have the real stock that should go on this weapon.

     

    Now now ... not all of us live in areas that allow the collapsible stock. Furthermore, with the Urbino my gun is 922r compliant and has a much improved LOP over the OEM stock it came with. It has an adjustable cheek riser for a perfect cheek weld with whatever optic I choose to put on the gun and a butt pad that significantly reduces the recoil beyond that of the OEM as well. It also has a sling mount that perfectly fits the configuration I need and has many more mount options should my needs change. The only limitation over the OEM, is that it requires a single flat head screw driver to remove it, and I don't see myself having to remove the stock often especially in a SHTF scenario nor do I see flat head screw drivers a hard to find item. It's also way WAY cheaper at $115 to $180 (depending on options) vs the $500+ common asking price of the collapsible stock.

     

    It's not fanboy-ism ... it's smart consumerism. It makes a great gun even better. It certainly suits my needs and I'm willing to bet it suits the needs of many others. :)

×
×
  • Create New...