blfuller
-
Posts
19 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Posts posted by blfuller
-
-
In looking at the parts schematic for the M2, it does not look like there is anything in the receiver aside from the pivot pin for the carrier latch. Sort of looks like an unburnt flake of powder stuck in the divot.
That is a left hand M2 isn't it? That may be the hole for the carrier latch pivot pin to come out if if it is removed and a powder flake got stuck in there or some other piece of debris. Isn't the carrier latch button on the right side of the receiver? Try flushing it out with a spray or scrub it with a tooth brush to remove it.
-
2
-
-
Got a 7 shot tube from SOCOMguy installed and in looking at an extended mag spring and I am wondering what the difference is on a 12ga spring direct from Wolff vs the special ones that FFT that they say is made by Wolff that is selling for 5x the price of a Wolff standard XP spring. I cannot see what the big difference is for the extra money. A mag tube spring is not really rocket science. For the cost I think I will try the one from Wolff. Anyone else do the same?
-
2
-
-
On 12/4/2021 at 12:53 PM, kilyung said:
Lovely pair! Out of curiosity why two?
His and hers?
-
Very nice. What color is your ceracoat? Difficult to tell if it is desert tan.
-
1
-
-
Tube found. Thanks SingleMalt.
-
On 2/16/2017 at 2:49 AM, Unobtanium said:
Realistic ETA?
What do you mean by "chemistry tested"?
He probably means it was chemically tested to determine the material. Only way I know of to test hardening is by using the Vickers, Knoop, Brinell & Rockwell testing process.
-
Just wondering if anyone out there has a fixed recoil spring tube assembly from a 1014 that you no longer need since you may have upgraded to a 3 position tube.
-
I, too, went with the 7 round Esstac in coyote.
-
I personally do no buy the "new anodize" process for the USMC. Hard anodizing is a MIL-A-8625, type III, class 2, finish which has been used on M16 receivers for many years. This is a problem with the dye process and/or the anodizing not being as thick as necessary to dye properly, or the post dye sealing process. They don't want to be having to redo a bunch of receivers so they make up some story.
They may have changed from type I or II to type III hard anodizing and probably have not got the process dialed in properly to produce the jet black finish. Also if they were doing a new process for the USMC then they most likely would not be doing it for all the receivers, only the USMC contract receivers.
Someone should find out exactly what the USMC is specifying for the new finish.
-
1
-
-
That is just the rubber covering for the buttstock. I believe the OP wants the complete grip for the collapsible stock.
-
SOLD to Pvman. Thanks!
-
21 hours ago, Unobtanium said:
Could the cam pin track im the carrier be machined incorrectly? Thats kindof what this looks like to me.
Cam pin could be or the hole that the cam pin goes into. Many variables.
-
38 minutes ago, Fett Tracking said:
Why selling?
Got a clone and it didn't fit.
-
New in box Mesa Urbino Tactical stock with adjustable cheek riser and Limbsaver recoil pad. Counts as 1 USA made part for 922r compliance. $150 shipped. Thanks for looking.
-
26 minutes ago, JGill2580 said:
Whats numrich?
They are presently out of stock of the pistol grip.
-
1
-
-
Holy cow. Ben Dover.
-
I would avoid using any solvent that will remove copper fouling with bronze brushes as it will eat them up.
M4 stamps different than others
in Benelli
Posted
It is the mark of the Gardone proof house that does the Benelli proof firings.