Anon4755
-
Posts
86 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Posts posted by Anon4755
-
-
27 minutes ago, brightt said:
hand guards sold, but can get more
open to offers, stock etc
Got pics of the stippled stock?
- 1
-
Did you do the stippling yourself?
- 1
-
On 3/30/2022 at 9:43 PM, Doge said:
That's an eye sore i can never un see now. Fn scars will always look different to me now lmao, never noticed this before even in person with the scars.
-
1 hour ago, 12508 said:
I have been shooting my 1301 a bunch the last two weeks testing out buckshot loads for reliability and patterns.
The 1301 recoils hard, probably due to its weight so I have been looking at loads in the 1250-1300fps range (it hasbeen completely reliable with low recoil slugs).
I went to clean it this morning (probaby about 120 or so rounds through it total) and found some shocking wear. See the pics below.
The piston housing is getting chewed up. And now the thin plastic tube the bolt carrier rides on is getting gouged. Will it crack? Who knows.This gun has already been back to Beretta for a bulged barrel. Oh, and today the action spring decided to unseat itself from the PLASTIC keeper and hang up
on the tube threads making disassembly a pain.
Below are shots of my 14 year old M4 and its pistons (second pic they have been cleaned with Hoppes). Not a hint of wear anywhere.
The fragillity of the 1301 is shocking. I think its best to just run it dirty and leave it that way.
And this is why the benelli m4 is still king of shotguns. Inb4 1301 shills seethe. Prepare for the seething.
- 1
-
3 hours ago, Fullassault said:
Not sure mine came like that, did you check yours?
I have a standard 11703 model, my rears are different and dont glow like that.
-
6 minutes ago, Fullassault said:
The rear are what come on my m1014. They are luminous. I actually like them better than the mepro night sights (black with no white around the tritium) the luminous sights work better for me in the daylight which is 99% of my shooting time
Where could i get one? Thanks.
-
1 minute ago, StreetSweeper56 said:
Thanks. I knew about the front but was curious about the rear.
- 1
-
57 minutes ago, Fullassault said:
What rear sights are those
-
Cheap ammo affects accuracy.
- 1
-
How far south are you in commiefornia? Bay area south or san diego south?
-
3 hours ago, Kahamu said:
I am also wondering this. I just re-qual'd on the M1014 about 3 months ago. Haven't heard anything about the 1301 coming to us.
I would assume its because the 1301 is not marine proof like the m1014 is.
- 1
- 1
-
On 9/11/2021 at 9:40 PM, Shomer said:
I owned a Benelli M4. Big fan on its reliability. But these are some facts to chew on. One, Benelli is own by Stoeger. Two, Stoeger is base out of Turkey. Argo system patent expires and we start seeing Benelli clones come out with the same inertial system. I let you come to your own conclusion and connect the dots. Would not be the first you, the consumer bought something for the name itself. USMC 0311
Benelli owns stoeger. Beretta owns both benelli and stoeger. Stoeger is based in Maryland and imports firearms. Getting your facts straight before posting can help. Also, usmc 0311? Do you have proof to this claim, or is this a case of stolen valor?
- 1
-
1 hour ago, JT111 said:
My M4 can be particular about lighter loads. I’m not sure it’s totally broken in yet. How many rounds does that take on average? Anyways, it is perfectly reliable with ammunition for which it was designed. God forbid I’ll ever have to actually use this gun in battle, but if I do, I won’t use the cheap Walmart target load if I can help it, lol. It stays cruiser ready with 00 buck in it. The 1301 has not failed once. I fully trust both of these shotguns. It’s great to own things that work.
I never "broke mine in" before i used light loads. I just put in whatever i had and it has worked flawless. When i held the 1301, it felt like a plastic toy, not to sound like a boomer, but the heft of the solid steel benelli vs the light plastic 1301, id be more trusting of the benelli in the chance id have to use the weapon for melee fights.
-
1 hour ago, Devil Dawg said:
I have two m4’s and one 1301 LE. I love my Benellis, but the 1301 does better with lower loads; not even one hiccup after firing about 500 rds this week. It’s a great weapon that hopefully will soon be combat proven by the US Military.
I have put around 8k shots through my Benelli m4, about 5k of them being light loads, never had a single issue with even fiocchi, which a lot seem to have issues with, or claim to. Been flawless.
- 1
-
20 minutes ago, StrangerDanger said:
I’ve fit a bunch of those FFT forends. I use a big flat metal file and remove material from the end closest to the muzzle. It’s a lot of trial and error to fit them since you don’t want to remove too much material. I use the seat ring at the base of the barrel to determine if the forend fits or not. Once I can’t slide a piece of paper between the ring and the receiver, I know it’s good to go. Without doing this, you could end up with light primer strikes since the bolt won’t fully rotate and lock into the barrel lugs.
Seems like a headache with anything FFT sells. I never heard one positive thing from FFT. I guess the one positive is hes from commiefornia and its easy to avoid those kind of people? Lol.
- 2
-
5 hours ago, Nocturnalnature said:
I wish I could find the old thread, but the general consensus was as you stated.
This is all from memory so it isn't word for word, but basically since most aftermarket forearms are aluminum or use bushings that don't compress, they have no give when tightening down the barrel.
If specs aren't exact then it could potentially cause pressure on the barrel lug during the recoil cycle.
So now i am curious what aftermarket parts are a no go for reasons like this.
-
1 hour ago, Nocturnalnature said:
I seem to recall this happening at least once before a few years ago, with Benelli claiming it was due to the use of aftermarket forends.
It's the main reason I have always chosen to use other parts to reach 922R compliance.
Im curious how an aftermarket forend would cause this. Is it due to where the aftermarket forends put pressure on that part?
-
1 minute ago, Ben elLes said:
I’ll invest in a better one. Having never used one I wanted to see how I liked it before shelling out the big bucks.
What power are you looking for? I can recommend optics to look at. Looking at a 4x? Red dot?
-
2 hours ago, Ben elLes said:
Was only my second time using it but I definitely had to raise it up about two inches this time yes.
That is a common trend with cheap optics, yes. My go to optic brands are trijicon and nightforce. Both are durable as heck, and marine proof like the benelli m4. I can take a trijicon optic off and on repeatedly and it will still hold a true zero. I can bash someones head in with a trijicon optic and itll hold a zero and still function. I dont like cheap parts on my tools that i need to rely on survival with.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, Ben elLes said:
Happy with the crossfire and the stock in the middle position. Excellent fit. Not sure if my sight moved or if 25 feet of difference caused me to have to move adjust it. Perhaps this is the difference between expensive and not so expensive?
Do you mean the crossfire optic isnt holding a zero?
-
Yes. Improved cylinder is the one you want to use for buckshot and slugs. Federal flite control likes cylinder chokes
-
-
Push the tab on the right side trigger guard with the red dot. Then pull the bolt back.
-
2 hours ago, SOCOMguy said:
To facilitate soldering acid flux is used. If the flux is not completely washed away and the residual neutralized rust will result.... like brown rust.
Joe B
Is it a bad thing if its appearing brown? Just curious.
Older vs Newer M4
in Benelli
Posted
True, but is polymer bomb proof like the rest of the firearm? Ignoring the stock and handguards of course.