OLGA,
After reading both your posts I realized two things”
1. The nice clover shaped groups at 50 yards were fired single shot with an empty mag.
2. When I moved to the 100 yard range the first two groups were fired with two rounds in the mag and gave me groups of “aprox” 1 ½” and I say aprox since I did not use a caliper to measure them, I just eyed them using the cuadricula of the target. The two groups strung vertically. The last group was fired with a full mag (4 shot group) and this was aprox 2” stringing vertically.
At that time I did not consider the opening of the groups as being related to having rounds in the mag. After being so please with the initial groups I was kind of relieved about the accuracy issue since this was my main concern, therefore I might not have been so careful and I didn’t even take the trouble to get a better rest or at least as good as the ones in the 50 yard range. The trigger didn’t help either. At that moment, with factory loads, dissipated concentration and chunks of wood covered with carpeting that bounced around after every shot, 2” seemed quite acceptable for a semiauto.
I went back home with a big smile and the certainty that with handloads and proper rests I could reduce those groups considerably. This is my first semiauto but not my first rifle and I know for a fact that with proper handloads and after experimenting with different powders and bullets, almost anything can be made to shoot moa. My great fear was, as you mentioned, that it would not keep the groups on paper.
I’m a hunter, not a target shooter so 2” groups at 100 yards are quite OK weather it is a bolt action or a semiauto to the point that handloads are not a must for a hunt. However this is my hobby and after I’m done with the three boxes of factory ammo that I purchased only for the brass, I will begin handloading as always.
Regarding the piston disintegrating, you have brought a big concern to my mind. For the moment the only thing I can say is that it seems quite obvious that this is not a self cleaning gas system and although it was not hard to clean I wonder what would happen if I fire 50 round in one session which is what I usually fire when experimenting with handloads. I guess we’ll have to try and see.
Since I have not had any problems so far I don’t know haw easy or difficult it is to deal with Benelli, Here in Canada you have to go through Stoeger, although in the Benelli USA page it clearly says that all repairs for Canadian customers are performed in the USA and the guns have to be sent to them.
And I agree with you, a rifle that is not reliable is not OK for hunting, it might put you in a very delicate, dangerous or life threatening situation and this is not acceptable to the point of liability, especially if there is a known design flaw with the gas piston yet it is continued to be advertised as a self cleaning and reliable system.
I don’t know how it could be done, but it would be great to somehow document as many rifles as possible that have had the piston issue. Maybe asking everyone that we know that has had this problem be invited to post in this forum. And this would be my legal argument if it ever becomes a problem with my rifle. Believe me, if this happens to my R1 I will hammer them in Canada the USA and Italy.
It is too soon to ascertain if my R1 is a lemon yet, but since I like shooting quite a bit and if this is a lemon it won’t be long to show.
My next trip to the range I will try again grouping with and without rounds in the mag and will post the results. I will also keep an eye on the gas piston and inform if there are any developments.
So far so good and I cross my fingers and touch on wood.
Let’s keep in touch regarding this.