Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/26/22 in Posts

  1. What Ben said, I think it was just an observation and not directed at you personally; in forums people occasionally drive-by, ask a question and are never seen again. I found the thread interesting. Welcome, stick around, ask questions and post away!
    1 point
  2. I'm new to posting on forums... for years, I've googled something and then read the corresponding link from my search query... only, this time, I actually signed up to participate on a forum and leave a comment, only to be subsequently notified by another member that the original poster "no longer cares".... Is that how this works?? If a post is older than a certain arbitrary time frame, am I not welcome to add my comments? (Eventhough the topic is still relevant) Am I supposed to create a new post? What's the standard internet thing to do? Please let a new member know...
    1 point
  3. To my knowledge no US Military has tested or opted for the Beretta 1301. Still, certain units in the Marine Corps used the 1014 . The 590 and 870 are still widely used even in the Marine Corps. But just like the 1911 the 1014 is a hoss, but the 1301 is no slouch, even though my round count on the 1301 is limited to roughly 3 months ( with no failures regardless of what I feed it) and My 1014 days started in 1999 I wouldn’t mine either weapons for an offensive or defensive situation. I’m blessed to own both.
    1 point
  4. I would assume its because the 1301 is not marine proof like the m1014 is.
    1 point
  5. This will be for those of you who do not want a clamp style mount that attaches directly to the barrel and/or shell tube. Required tools & hardware: - Dremel & cutoff wheel - Vise - File - 20mm-25mm o-ring - GG&G Benelli M2 sling and flashlight mount - Your light of choice that will mount to a pic rail Since the GG&G M2 light mount has a smaller scalloped cut than what is required to fit on the M3, some cutting and shaping is required: Start out by using the original sling mount as a stencil for tracing out the required cut out size onto the GG&G mount for a reference when cutting with a dremel [Figure 1]. Once the outline is traced, use a dremel to remove material [Figures 2, 3]. Once the rough shape is cut out, use a file to remove burrs and slowly and precisely shape the cut. Be sure to test fit often, as you do not want to make an oversized cut and have a loose fitting part [Figure 4]. Once this part is complete, it’s time to move on to the original sling mount. This will still be required to ensure the shell tube nut has a ratcheted engagement. I chose to remove the sling mount with the dremel, but this is not required if you’d like to have additional sling mounts on your shotgun [Figure 5]. All parts should now properly fit. When test fitting, you may have noticed that the GG&G mount is loose and may rattle even when the tube nut is tightened down. This is where the o-ring is used. It will evenly fill the gap and provide for a secure fit. Slide the o-ring onto the tube as far as it will go on the threads until it butts up against the barrel block [Figure 6]. Then install the GG&G mount, then the original sling mount, and then the tube nut. Add your flashlight if choice (the lighter the better as to decrease the possibility of a malfunction due to the recoil operating system) [Figures 7-10].
    1 point
  6. Interesting. Who is adopting the 1301?
    1 point
  7. I stand by my opinion, as posted elsewhere on this forum, that the M4 is a markedly better built combat grade weapon, while the 1301T is “a hunting gun converted to a tactical model by the addition of black furniture”. The lightness of the 1301 models is due to the use of lower quality plastic parts than are on my M4 and don’t create a level of comfort for me that warrant the cost savings. I bought my M4’s because I’m willing to pay the price for the most durable combat grade weapon available for my needs (home defense, duty work, truck gun, etc). I couldn’t care less about the M4’s ability to shoot “light loads”; My M4 will only see buckshot and slugs that it was designed for and which it handles flawlessly. I know I sound like a broken record but another user posted a quote from the owner of Battlefield Vegas : “If I could only ever own just one shotgun in my life, it would be the Benelli M4.” That convinced me. I’m glad your 1301’s have been reliable for you and that you’re happy with them. I’m just not willing, and don’t need, to drop down in price / quality / reliability / durability for my shotguns and the roles they fill. PS - The more I read your message the more it comes across as a kinda pompous reply. Perhaps I’m misreading it or missing your true intent? I’m willing to listen if you have a legitimate argument and reason (other than “It’s lighter”) as to the superiority of the 1301 over the M4.
    1 point
  8. After putting 100 rnds thru my buds 1301, i much prefer my M4. Nothing wrong with the 1301, it just didnt feel like my cup of tea
    1 point
  9. Benelli owns stoeger. Beretta owns both benelli and stoeger. Stoeger is based in Maryland and imports firearms. Getting your facts straight before posting can help. Also, usmc 0311? Do you have proof to this claim, or is this a case of stolen valor?
    1 point
  10. I owned a Benelli M4. Big fan on its reliability. But these are some facts to chew on. One, Benelli is own by Stoeger. Two, Stoeger is base out of Turkey. Argo system patent expires and we start seeing Benelli clones come out with the same inertial system. I let you come to your own conclusion and connect the dots. Would not be the first you, the consumer bought something for the name itself. USMC 0311
    -1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...