Jump to content



Recommended Posts

I've got:

Leupold VX-III 6.5-20 X 50

Leupold VX-III 3.5-10 X 50

Zeiss Conquest 3.-10 X 44

Bushnell 3200 3-9 X 40

I also once had a Zeiss in the 6.5-20 X 50 as well.


As others have stated, it's hard to go wrong with either brand.

I'd give a slight edge to Zeiss.

I really like the middle ground covered by the 44mm obj. on my BAR. Bigger and more light gathering than the 40, but not as clunky as the 50 mm.


As for the reticle, you choose whatever suits you. if you want a fine crosshair, then get one. But if you want a heavier one, then they're available as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Zeiss Conquest, especially in low light (that's the model that I have and I looked side by side at Leupold VXIII before buying this). But both Conquest and Leupold are not great compared to the high end Zeiss scopes like the 1.5-6 version they have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Create New...