Jump to content

Unobtanium

Members
  • Posts

    3545
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    91

Everything posted by Unobtanium

  1. Unobtanium

    No respect

    My problems with him: Failed stimulus plan that wasted tonnes of money. Healthcare bill that promises to burn even more money and cause lots of other problems. Budget plans for spending as much money as Bush did in TWO terms, in one.
  2. I researched your price. $900 is right in line with FMV currently.
  3. I don't think a diagnosis of bi-polar is supported by his symptoms. I would lean more towards schizophrenia based on his experiencing delusions of grandeur as well as illusions (saying his mag-tube was advertised as something it wasn't, believing he actually ran it over with a tractor, etc.) as well as the "word salads" he has posted. For this, maybe some Seroquel or Abilify.
  4. I am interested in the OEM fixed PG stock. Please shoot me a PM detailing its condition, and how much you want for it.
  5. Glad to see that after a billion pages it finally sunk in. I have to say though, you got a bit loopy when off the percocet. You also had to wait to get a refill (meaning you took it all before it was refill time). These two, when put togather, are a disconcerting thing...
  6. and with some of the proceeds, he will purchase a full-length mag tube, a heat-gun, and some blue locktite...
  7. They are all over the place where I live. Also all over the internet. Same as 6 months ago. Do you live in another country though? If not in the US, I can see where you might have had trouble.
  8. Was it a perma-ban or just a vacation?
  9. Sorry, I think you are right. Ghey 2-piece mag-tube. Better?
  10. We fully expect to see an order for a full-length tube to be posted within a few days...
  11. Along with ghey civilian limiter.
  12. Can you take a picture?
  13. Good stuff!
  14. If I bought it I would sell the stock for $450+ a PG stock and then sell the PG stock+M4 for $600 to a friend who has been admiring my M4. However, I did not see
  15. http://www.ar15.com/forums/topic.html?b=7&f=93&t=724488
  16. Meh, imho wives are expected to screw around. THen again, what do I know. I am still 23. All I have are other people to go by, Have not tried the marriage thing myself. *A motorcycle is a vehicle.
  17. +1 Dog, vehicle, gun Where I live, those are grounds for unspecified and unspeakable retribution if you mess with them.
  18. Took me FOREVER (few hours) to find a 5.5mm wrench for mine.
  19. The screw would have to turn. The detent is pretty darn stiff. I suspect some peckerwood FUDD was tampering as long as there are no mechanical problems with your sight.
  20. I don't see how this could occur unless a part is broken, missing, or someone messed with your weapon.
  21. It took me FOREVER to get the accurate B/C and correct drag-factors and all that jazz for this, but here is OOO, OO, and #4 buckshot at 20 yards, the 8 pellets I launched impacted with 1616# of energy. At this same distance, a load of 9-pellet OO Buck would impart 1359# of energy, and #4 buck, if all 27 pellets managed to hit, would impart 1458# of energy. Stepping back to 40 yards, assuming a 10% attrition-rate of pellets, 90% of the payload (rounded down to the nearest pellet) of OOO would impart 1141# of energy. OO would impart 968# of energy. #4 buck would impart 1008# of energy (90% on-target with #4 at 40 yards is a pipe-dream though, imho). At any rate, the military has determined that 58# of energy is the minimal "effective" amount of energy to disable a man. I have nothing more to say about that, except minimal seems like a hyperbole here. As you can see, out to 40 yards, the energy dumped on-target is around 1,000#, which is pretty impressive. However, looking at the INDIVIDUAL projectile energy is key, as that will disclose penetration potential, etc.
  22. All you need is the BC for a sphere the size of buckshot and the initial velocity and you can calculate anything you want.
  23. Hold, and I will post some #'s for you.
  24. I only went off of one shot, and if that one shot was good, I tested further. Since its first shot eliminated it from the running, I did not bother.
  25. The Tac-8 was less than stellar. At 40 yards the span was larger than the Federal OOO, and the distribution was pure crap. Two sets of 4 pellets clumped, one at the top of the target, one at the bottom. Epic fail imho.
×
×
  • Create New...