Sukhoi_fan
-
Posts
1089 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
33
Posts posted by Sukhoi_fan
-
-
I ordered mine with cheek riser and limbsaver in black, when I was told about it shipping the guy looked up my order and said it should ship in a week or two.
What was your total cost on that?
-
What Kind of shell holder is that ?
It's a Mesa Tactical item, but I'm guessing it won't work on the OEM buttstock on the M4, maybe it will work on the Urbino.
-
Sukhoi, the urbino pistol grip looks just like the Benelli
Doesn't look that way to me.
The Mesa rubber PG appears to have a sharper edge in the transition to the back as well as appearing to have more of a flat back, so no, it does not look "just like" the OEM rubber PG to me. Also, the lip extending out at the bottom front definitely appears to be more pronounced on the Mesa PG. I prefer the OEM rubber PG.
-
I'm wondering if it's possible to put the Benell OEM rubber PG on the Mesa stock.
-
Besides the 'axle bushing' aka pin, you're likely to also need a new retaining spring, a new retaining spacer, and a new retaining ring. And then you're going to need a pair of inside split ring pliers small enough to get that retaining ring into it's groove. Then once you've got it all assembled you're likely going to have to take it all apart again and tweak the retaining spring so it will allow the the axle bushing (pin) to pass through and engage it.
-
An al follower has less mass therefore less inertia, making for a quicker action over a ss follower.
-
Lame. Got nothin' on the Saiga. You can actually buy a Saiga at a reasonable price (if detachable mag shotguns are your thing). That monstrosity isn't available to us lowly 'civilians'. And the biggest distinction is, the Saiga is an AK whereas this thing isn't.
-
Witch pattern? Just in time for Halloween, huh?
-
That's common sense, this is supposed to be a fun thread Dr. Spock...
Anybody can shoot a dog 
. But as the post is titled...."First line of defense". I never expect my dog to be a hero, that's for sure. If I did, I wouldn't be armed now would I?Your 'first line of *defense*' is subject to being breached in under a second. lol
Here's a thought: get another dog to work with that one and double the length of time your 'first line of *defense*' remains viable.
FWIW I rely on protection dogs myself, but I comprehend their limitations. And yes, I DO expect my dog to be a 'hero' by charging into the fight at WOT without any hesitation, and I fully appreciate the consequences.
From my perspective a dog which is a component to one's home defense is strictly a buffer.
-
gettingold, check your private messages.
-
There's not a dog alive that's bullet-proof, knife-proof, or bludgeon-proof. The most you can ever hope for out of any dog is for the dog to buy you a little time so you can seize the initiative. To think otherwise is just downright foolish. "My (insert 'badass' dog breed here) is the most awesome sort of protection dog there is" is a cherished delusion of many.
A genuine sociopath will take that dog out so fast it will make your head spin.
I suggest you keep your HD weapons at the ready and use the dog strictly as a meatshield. If you have to 'bust out' your HD then you're on the wrong end of the torque curve.
-
I gather it's a purely arbitrary thing which the ATF pulled out of their ***.
-
First of all, you need to get some proper hearing protection before you damage your hearing any more than you have. Ringing in the ears is an indication of hearing damage.
And personally I see no benefit at all in using 3" rounds over 2 3/4" rounds, much less 3.5" rounds. From my experience, 3" rounds produce very irregular patterns vs. 2 3/4" rounds, at least with buckshot.
-
Until I see and urbino in person I'll stick with the oem. Only benefit is a better cheek weld for optics from my understanding. Also does it even collapse or is it just a shorter lop?
no 'collapsing' (if that's what you wanna call the fully retracted c stock), just the shorter LOP and the cheek riser
I found no real benefit from the fully retracted c stock, I viewed it more of 'what's the point?'
-
btw, there are currently 2 c stocks listed on feebay - a dreamer has one listed for 950 and a realist has one listed with a 3 position recoil tube for 200
-
given the choice between an Urbino and a c stock in this economy I don't know why anyone would even want a c stock...to cut the overall length by a mere 3"? to look tacti-cool??? it just isn't worth the extra cost imo when the Urbino is superior (and yes, I had a c stock briefly)
-
Who would ever shoot a gun like that???
As was posted one would be better off getting a couple of choppers for that kind of money and have some fun.
-
considering the price of new barrels and limited options, you may want to think about just getting another shotty to suit your needs
http://www.gunpartscorp.com/catalog/Products.aspx?catid=10307
-
Thx for the photos
I've also always found that the patterns are blown apart and very irregular with the 3" rounds. The other disadvantages to 3" - less magazine capacity, more muzzle flash, and more difficulty staying on target with the extra recoil. Conclusion: forget the 3" rounds and only use the 3" when that's all ya got.During a previous testing I performed I found that the 3-inch shells consistently patterned worse(waaay wider) than 2.75-inch shell. -
Does anybody know if Botach has these back in stock yet or when they're gonna get them back in stock?
I got an email from the fellow with Botach who posted on that thread indicating they had no timeframe for having those stocks available again, so IOW, out of stock indefinitely.
-
I get the impression that one or more of those listings are courtesy of Uncle Sam's inventory in the sandbox.
-
I see it's got one of those $1,000 buttstocks on it, that makes all the difference. lol
Don't see the benefit of not having a barrel which takes screw-in chokes though.
-
Other than the "L.E." stamped on the side of the receiver, how is this gun different from all the other M4s being manufactured?
-
Price reduced
The Wrong Way to do Entry
in Benelli
Posted
Note that they were all using G3s for their entry exercise. Makes absolutely no sense to use a machinegun in 7.62 NATO as an entry weapon. But then I suppose it fits in with the rest of their ineptitude.