Jump to content

BK02

Members
  • Posts

    39
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by BK02

  1. I’m not sure what I would charge, but I could make another one. I’d have to order some more 17-4 off McMaster carr first. What would you pay? Lol
  2. I didn’t really like the factory charging handle due to how skinny it was and the amount of play it had rotating and slop the “buttstock to muzzle direction”. I decided I could try to make my own on my mini lathe. First, I took measurements of all of the critical areas, or areas I thought were most important. On the first prototype, I discovered the most important measurement was the distance from the ball detent notch to the area where it tapered from .199” to .258”. On the 1st prototype, I made the notch too far down the shaft, causing the handle to be easily pulled out and or twisted since the ball was barley in the notch. The 1st prototype was also made from 4340. Didn’t like the idea of having to blue it and keep it oiled to keep it from rusting. The 2nd prototype and my final product were both machined out of 1/2” bar h900 17-4. Machined surprisingly well on my mini lathe using micrograin carbine tooling and medium speeds. The 4340 was almost too gummy and soft, and was chipping edges of my tools, which is probably due to lack of machining experience. Had zero tools break or chip while using the 17-4. Since I was making my own, my main goal was to eliminate play, and make the handle between .400” and .500” in diameter. The 2nd prototype was .500” in diameter and had zero play. Was machined from 17-4 as previously mentioned. My goal was to get a close match with the titanium cerakote by stone washing. (I literally used stones off of a dirt road and put them in a water bottle. Wrapped water bottle in socks, and had it go through the dryer’s tumble/no heat mode for about 8 hours. Came out looking really good, but didn’t match.) The handle was also heavier than I wanted it to be. I figured if the handle was too heavy it would cause feeding issues when using lighter loads. The main reason it was too heavy was because I only used a 5/16” drill, meaning there was about .094” of wall thickness. Way thicker than needed, especially while using such a strong steel. While this handle was heavier than the stock one by a decent margin, had no issues cycling what I’d consider medium target loads through my benelli m4, which only had around 50 rounds of buckshot through it at that point. With the 2nd prototype installed, I shot 50 fiochhi target loads, 30 Federal LE slugs, and 50 rounds of Winchester SuperX buckshot with 0 malfunctions which surprised me due to how heavy it was. My final product weighed a good amount less due to the handle being around .450” in diameter and me using an 11/32” bit. This made wall thickness somewhere around .055”. Still more thick than necessary for what this is being used for. Since the stonewash didn’t have the effect I was looking for, I figured I’d give it a decent polish to match the TT lifter I have on my gun. I really like the look, and the polishing didn’t make it any more slick than the stonewash finish. I also rounded the end of the handle making insertion easier than previous designs. Also makes marring the finish on the barrel less likely when using the handle to disassemble the piston assembly. As you can see by the pictures, I only put one notch on the charging handle. I don’t know why the factory one has three notches, but that is one of the things that causes the handle to have slop. Using only one notch made the handle really tight and have zero slop in any direction, while also still being easy enough to remove by twisting and pulling. I also made the smallest diameter part of the shaft +.002” compared to the factory .199”. This eliminated the “front to back slop” I mentioned. If anyone is interested in the measurements I used, send me a DM and I’ll send you a picture of my drawing I made of the factory handle and it’s measurements and my handle and it’s measurements. Thanks for reading, Bryce
  3. BK02

    Rmr vs t2 for m4

    That’s what I was thinking. I’m not sure what they could do to make the t2 better. Maybe 7075? The glass is already basically crystal clear, battery life is great. As long as they don’t add some dumb shake awake shit or a solar panel, I don’t care.
  4. BK02

    Rmr vs t2 for m4

    Just got the aimpoint in today. Paid the extra $20 or whatever it was for overnight because I have a 3 day weekend and wanted it to get here. Don’t think I’ll be getting the scalarworks mount. I like the height it sits at on the stock rail. Feels similar to shouldering my ar with the 1/3 cowitness eotech that’s on there. Took some pictures in case anyone wants to know how it looks
  5. BK02

    Rmr vs t2 for m4

    Yeah I looked at the p2. Already ordered the t2 though. It’s more tried and true than the newer stuff and is obviously top notch, so not too worried about it. And if a t3 comes out, that’s just another reason to spend more money lol
  6. BK02

    Rmr vs t2 for m4

    Thanks for all the suggestions and help. I’m going to order a t2 with the lowest mount in the morning and if it’s too high on the factory rail, I’ll buy the scalarworks mount for it.
  7. BK02

    M4 Picture Thread

    Is it actually plastic or does the pictures online just make it look that way
  8. BK02

    M4 Picture Thread

    What optic is on the top one? Sorry if it’s already been mentioned
  9. BK02

    Rmr vs t2 for m4

    I’m looking to put a red dot on my m4. I like the size of the rmr, but looking through one before, I didn’t like the blue tint. I haven’t looked through a t2, but from pictures and what I hear they are basically crystal clear like an eotech. Does the .8” factory aimpoint mount have any co-witness if installed on the factory rail? I would like to use the scalarworks mount, but can’t find one in stock. Just wanting feedback on which everyone prefers and why. And pictures would be cool too thanks for the help
  10. From how most cerakoters do it, I’m pretty sure it’s anodized like the normal one underneath the cerakote, and steel parts, like barrel and tube, should be manganese phosphated
  11. Was there small dents in the primers of the shells that didn’t go off? If so, probably light strikes from the light hammer spring. If reliability is a concern, it’s best to not mess with the trigger on most weapon systems.
  12. BK02

    Carrier defect?

    The bolt carriers are forged? If so, that’s awesome, wasn’t aware of that.
  13. When I emailed socomguy, he said he had a few h2o ones on hand and shipped one out to me the next morning. Got here a total of 3 days after I sent the email asking if he still made them. Tube fit great and looks great as well. If I get another M4, he will be the guy I get one from again.
×
×
  • Create New...