Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just curious how much you guys think the time and effort is worth to build someone a 922r compliant 7 round capacity M4.  

I would think it's around $300-$500 in gunsmithing.  I am into this one for about $2500 for the M4 and parts.

 

20210519_185223.jpg

Posted

If you are talking about a whole bunch of customization just for the sake of customizing, I wouldn't pay anything for that. 

Only because IMO, parts that many people so often replace don't really gain anything and are superfluous bling. But that is just my opinion.

It's quite easy to make an M4 922R compliant. The degree of easy depends on which parts you change out. A US made 7 round tube and follower is 2 parts and US made hand guards makes 3. Done. But I would go with OEM hand guards stippled by Tango Arms and use the A&S trigger housing for #3.  And as long as you have a cheap heat gun, this example of a conversion can be done in less than a hour.

If you have a collapsable stock model, you need to replace 4 parts to comply instead of the 3 that would be necessary in your example above.

If you want to go deeper and change the trigger housing and associated parts, that too can be easily done with a few basic gunsmithing tools, such as snap ring pliers, punches, and a plastic bench block.

Again, that conversion can be done in an hour or less. I do everything I can to do my own work rather than risk shipping an expensive firearm back and forth. 

So, 2 hours of gunsmithing + parts=?

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, MrMilitaryPolice said:

922r is overrated

I don't know about overrated but, yeah, it's just another stupid law written by imbeciles who likely know zero about weapons, designed for nothing other than to punish law abiding gun owners into submission.

That said though, I would not want to be caught in that trap.

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 1
Posted

I think American gun manufactures were upset that their gun sales were losing to imported war surplus firearms coming into the US. So they had their lobbyists propose laws to try to beat out their competition. 

Posted
21 minutes ago, Gmcrigger2007 said:

I think American gun manufactures were upset that their gun sales were losing to imported war surplus firearms coming into the US. So they had their lobbyists propose laws to try to beat out their competition. 

I seriously doubt that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...