Unobtanium

I want to see it, but I want even more not to go to a movie theater.

Taran Butler of TTI. Reeves is actually technically at a competitive 3 gun shooter proficiency level in the real world. The man can legitimately shoot, and shoot well.

Limbsaver 10403 on a pistol grip oem m4 civilian 11707 is my preferred setup. This includes c stock, urbino, and field, all of which I've tried.

So I got the last and the best of the G hammers. I should have bought every damn one of them in stock.

I'm not an FFT fanboy, but man, everyone puts a lemon out from time to time. FFT gave me my money back without argument. Even Geissele has put out FCG's that have broken. In half.

FFT refunded my purchase in full. I have no qualms with FFT's transaction. I did not mess with it enough to see what was wrong. I sent it all back, and it worked fine with the OEM FCG, so I left it at that.

Good pix! I also am curious, is my Geissele "normal" in being unfinished like this? None of the hook parts of the hammer, nor the base of it (pictured) have any finish. Looks like they were profiled AFTER the finish was done.

Can you quantify the benelli vs. geissele hammer comparison? [video=youtube_share;y7GIrT26V8M]

Urbino is great, all except the attachment method. Kills it for me.

Well screw me for getting the complete fft kit and it failing gloriously. I have luck like that though.

I honestly don't know. I do know that FFT has piggybacked on Carrier Comp before, and necessarily in a symbiotic fashion. I would call and ask TTI.

FFT is run by a good guy. Even Kip spoke well of him to me. That said, I just do not find FFT's products to be in line with my personal design philosophy. The fact that their FCG didn't work when I bought it to try out was the deal killer.

I'm in the "oem only" camp here. Benelli designed the fcg very well, and I have never had an issue with it. I have had issues with FFT, and TTI can't even design a bolt handle for an M4. Just not something I want to muck with, although I have a geissele hammer I may or may not end up installing in my project.

Ps. The bolt catch roll pin on OPs weapon needs love.

I said it sucked years ago when TTI pimped it on this forum.

With an M300U, and a battery, and all hardware, it adds 4.7oz total to the shotgun. Mine arrived, as well, and I am VERY pleased with it! The form factor is flawless, the mounting appears very solid. I would have preferred larger gaps on either side, though, because I feel that at about 20 in-lb, the halves would make solid contact. I stopped at about what my fingers (lots of experience mounting expensive glass with torque wrenches in expensive rings) call 10-15 in-lb, and I had only around 0.002" clearance (feeler-gauge measured) on either side of the gaps. I used Loctite 243 on all screws. I love that formulation.

People need to stop talking to the BATFE. Just stop. It will never help. It will only hurt. Anyone/everyone.

While I like the output of the M600, I prefer the M300 because of the much shorter "lever" it provides if impacted from the side, etc. on the mount.

I use a Tornado brush and BreakFree gunscrubber, which is supposed to remove plastic fouling from shot cups.

It honestly might fit, but it looks like a downgrade functionally regarding adjustments.

Protective wings don't bother me any. Same as an m4 carbine sight. I'm used to and like them.

Sure. Instead of the "mickey mouse ears" dot alignment, you just shoot it like a normal ghost ring with no distractions or off-axis visual cues. FSP in the center of the ring on the target bang! *Sorry for the fuzz, the OEM sight was living on the floor. Ironically, I was inspired by Battlefield 4. The M1014 in that game does not have the wings, either... You can actually set the darn thing up exactly like a real M1014, RDS, light, 8 shots, (won't ghost load, lol). Kindof like having a model car of your real car!

Fusion in Florida imports LPA sights.

I am going T2. Why? I don't need to remove it to replace batteries. Rain cannot get between the laser projection and the "screen". It's more durable. The glass is much clearer/better. It sits lower in relation to the irons and gives a better use of them. It costs similar enough that finances should not enter the discussion, at this level, IMO

IS end of feb for the T2 mounts as sure a thing as can be in this industry, or is it just a "we hope..." type deadline?